Thursday, February 3, 2011

Which is More Educating: Internet or Fine Arts?

The readings of this week were very interesting and gave a new perspective of learning in the “internet age” verses the traditional ways of learning through books. Both Kearney’s discussion of media literacy programs and the article “Online R U Really Reading?” discussion on what children learn from the internet verses a book talk about the new age of learning.

On page 100, Kearney explains that putting so much emphasis on the fine arts over commercial pop culture “do little to encourage students ‘to draw upon their experience and knowledge, and to connect their education with political practice, or to be critical and active citizens in a democracy.’” This idea goes hand in hand with one of the points in the article. The article explains that “‘In a tenth of the time,’ he said, the Internet allows a reader to ‘cover a lot more of the topic from different points of view.’ Zachary Sims, the Old Greenwich, Conn., teenager, often stays awake until 2 or 3 in the morning reading articles about technology or politics on up to 100 Web sites. Though he also likes to read books, Zachary craves interaction with fellow readers on the Internet. ‘The Web is more about a conversation,’ he said. ‘Books are more one-way.’” The interaction that students receive from blogging about certain books or reading someone’s perspective on a news article from someone’s Facebook status gives the students different ideas and perspectives on what they are shown. Instead of only focusing on books, I believe they need to include the interaction of student with what they are learning, specifically by drawing “upon their experience and knowledge.”

As for the argument that the students have low literacy rates because they only read online, I feel as though that may be changing. It is now extremely easy to get books offline with Kindle and Nook both for PC and in the carry-around equipment. Also, students can see many people’s opinions and recommendations of books from reading Twitter updates, Facebook statuses from 600+ friends, and different blogs. They can then download the book with one click and can read for themselves to help form an opinion either with the recommender or opposite of the recommender. One way to facilitate this reading on their own along with gaining outside perspective would be for Kindle or Nook or the equivalent forms of e-book reading would include some form of chat between those reading the book or links to blogs about it to further this interaction.

4 comments:

  1. I agree with Zachary that "'books are more one- way.'" When Zachary uses the internet and is able to interact with fellow readers,it gives him an opportunity to view different perspectives like we are doing in this online class. Such a learning modality serve to enrich our thoughts and allow us to produce our own work that has substance. Online reading and other computerized ways of learning belong to the culture of this generation. We either get comfortable using it or get left behind.

    Most jobs today, even those ordinary ones at Walmart and Home Depot need an online application. If one is not computer literate, one would not be able to make it to the interview. I do agree with Kearney that putting so much emphasis on the fine arts over commercial pop culture “do little to encourage students."

    Thank you for a good article.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I enjoyed the article R U reading and liked your ides that you posted. However, what scares me about all the digital reading like the argument posted, the idea of reading books is important. Im fearful that one day there won't be any books and everything will be digital and books will be obsolete, antiques, something you put up on your shelf for display. It's a scary thought but look how quickly technology changes. There is something about throwing a blanket on and cuddleing up on the couch on a rainy day and reading a good book.......

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really enjoyed your post, and completely agree with the statement that while books are one-way, the internet is more of a conversation. This class itself is living proof of that - instead of all of us just reading the texts and gleaning what knowledge we individually did from them, we're posting our beliefs online, discussing them with each other, and learning from each other and our differing opinions. Pretty fascinating, if you ask me!

    I also really love the title you chose for your entry. I think the debate over reading online versus the "fine arts," is rife with a number of broader issues such as social class, status, the definition of art itself, the inclusion/refusal of men's/women's work in the literary canon, etc. ... In any case, I think your title alone brings up a lot of awesome points we could explore even more.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I myself love reading certain things online, but nothing can take the place of cuddling up with a great book while lying in bed or on the beach. I also love art and love reading on the internet about new artists and revisiting sites about past artists, but again, nothing can take the place (especially online images) of the original works.

    ReplyDelete